tree

 But an infinite amount of something means any amount of variations to that something. With enough variations you get a completely different universe, especially with when those branches happen. There’s no limit to what kind of universe you get when infinite is taken in to account. That’s the whole point an infinite multiverse. The more branching off points, the more differences accumulate. An infinite amount of branches equate to an infinite amount of differences.

But you’re forgetting the MCU lore in the process… The MCU defines how a universe operates based on the the infinity stones… So we can’t just look at standard mathematical probabilities, but we have to also look at the lore

But even the infinity stones in what if are different. The infinity smasher didn’t work for ultron’s infinity stones because they are different from each other. They don’t even work the same because Captain Carter is able to handle them without getting hurt.

I understand all of your points but branches happen off of other branches, and if we’re two steps removed from the main branch then there are two sets of differences. It’d be different if all of the branches were off of the main 616 branch but we know branches lead to other branches. The more branches off of branches happen the farther those branches get from the sacred timeline. If every branch on the same tree can lead to infinite branches then the possibilities for what every universe in that multiverse can be is limitless. It’s the same how evolution works. Everything is connected but a human is clearly different than bacteria. The multiverse is essentially the evolution of universes. The farther we get from the from the 616, the more differences we should see. An infinite amount of minuscule changes to one thing should lead to an infinite amount of  different things and eventually vastly different universes. They even said as much in their marketing, “a Multiverse of infinite possibilities.” Does that not mean literally anything can happen? Also, just because we haven’t seen branches of 838 and the paint universe in What If doesn’t mean they’re not branches. The whole point of What If is to show different universes as it pertains to the MCU. That’s more of creative directive, I do believe Marvel has limited the What If writers to only things the MCU has established so far. If I’m wrong, then I’m wrong. I just think one multiverse is simpler and it’s the way it’s been done in every other movie/TV franchise.

But you’re assuming that the paint universe was that way the whole time. We don’t know that. These changes can naturally happen or by something intervening with the multiverse. I think the further branches are the harder it is to travel to them. But people like America or the Watcher can easily travel to them. Even the 1602 episode mentions that Scarlet Witch gets Peggy from a neighboring universe.

Someone or something could’ve made the paint universe that way. We don’t know the history of the paint universe. There are a plethora of alternate dimensions that exist and we don’t know where they came (ex Dark Dimension, Quantum Realm). The 1602 Wanda knows how to bring other people from different universes,that doesn’t necessarily mean that our Wanda would know how to do that. Especially, if the Darkhold is telling our Wanda to do evil things to get her children, she wasn’t thinking straight. I do get your points on how hard  traveling the multiverse is supposed to be and figuring what is supposed to cause incursions. You’re right about just agreeing to disagree and we’ll see what Marvel establishes when we get the next Multiverse project. I do appreciate the discussion though. I hope I didn’t come across as aggressive or anything. I just like debating nerd stuff especially the MCU.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Coming Attractions: Developing An OB Model

Image
  Coming Attractions: Developing An OB Model 1.6  Compare the three levels of analysis in this text’s OB model. We conclude this chapter by presenting a general model that defines the field of OB and stakes out its parameters, concepts, and relationships. By studying the model, you will have a good picture of how the topics in this text can inform your approach to management issues and opportunities. Overview A  model  is an abstraction of reality, a simplified representation of some real-world phenomenon.  Exhibit  1-3  presents the skeleton of our OB model. It proposes three types of variables (inputs, processes, and outcomes) at three levels of analysis (individual, group, and organizational). In the chapters to follow, we proceed from the individual level ( Chapters  2  through  8 ) to group behavior ( Chapters  9  through  14 ) to the organizational system ( Chapters  15  through  17 ). The model illustrates that inputs lead to processes, which lead to outcomes; we discuss interre
Read more

There are Few Absolutes in OB

  There are Few Absolutes in OB 1.4  Demonstrate why few absolutes apply to OB. Laws in the physical sciences—chemistry, astronomy, physics—are consistent and apply in a wide range of situations. They allow scientists to generalize about the pull of gravity or to be confident about sending astronauts into space to repair satellites. Human beings are complex, and few, if any, simple and universal principles explain human behavior. Because we  are not alike, our ability to make simple, accurate, and sweeping generalizations about ourselves is limited. Two people often act very differently in the same situation, and the same person’s behavior changes in different situations. For instance, not everyone is motivated by money, and people may behave differently at a religious service than they do at a party. This doesn’t mean, of course, that we can’t offer reasonably accurate explanations of human behavior or make valid predictions. It does mean that OB concepts must reflect situational, or
Read more

Complementing Intuition with Systematic Study

Image
  Complementing Intuition with Systematic Study 1.2  Show the value of systematic study to OB. Whether you’ve explicitly thought about it before or not, you’ve been “reading” people almost all your life by watching their actions and interpreting what you see, or by trying to predict what people might do under different conditions. The casual approach to reading others can often lead to erroneous predictions, but using a systematic approach can improve your accuracy. Underlying the systematic approach is the belief that behavior is not random. Rather, we can identify fundamental consistencies underlying the behavior of all individuals and modify them to reflect individual differences. These fundamental consistencies are very important. Why? Because they allow for predictability. Behavior is generally predictable, and the  systematic study  of behavior is a means to making reasonably accurate predictions. When we use the term  systematic study , we mean looking at relationships, attempti
Read more